Thursday, October 11, 2012

Syria says plane from Russia carried legal cargo | News | GMA ...

DAMASCUS - Syria said on Thursday a Damascus-bound plane forced to land in Ankara by Turkish fighter jets while en route from Moscow had been carrying legitimate cargo.

?

The Foreign Ministry said the Turkish action violated international law and showed Ankara's "hostile policy" towards Syria.

?

"All contents of the civilian Syrian plane that Turkish authorities forced to land at Ankara airport were listed on the statutory bill of lading and on the plane's manifest. It was not carrying any kind of weapons or prohibited goods," the ministry said in a statement.

?

The head of Syrian Arab Airlines, Ghaida Abdulatif, said the cargo consisted of civilian packages with electrical equipment which had been officially registered.

?

The state news agency SANA also quoted Abdulatif as saying Turkish authorities "assaulted the plane's crew before it was allowed to take off", without giving details.

?

Lebanon's al-Manar Television earlier quoted Syria's transport minister as describing Turkey's action as an act of air piracy.

?

Turkish officials suspected it was carrying military equipment to Syria, where President Bashar al-Assad's forces are fighting rebels.

?

The Foreign Ministry said that by using military means to force the plane to land, the Turkish government violated international laws.

?

"The sudden appearance of military aircraft, without justification or warning, threatened the safety of the plane and passengers," it said.

?

"This hostile and deplorable Turkish act is an additional indication of the hostile policy of Erdogan's government, considering that it trains and harbors terrorists and helps them infiltrate into and bombard Syrian territory."

?

Turkey, once an ally of Assad, has become a leading international voice calling for him to quit and has allowed rebel leaders sanctuary on its territory.

?

The cargo incident adds to increased tensions as the two sides square off against each other along their border after Syrian artillery fire landed on Turkish soil last week.

?

The Syrian Foreign Ministry statement added a conciliatory note, saying that despite the Turkish government's aggressive behavior, Syria still wanted to maintain friendly relations with the Turkish people.

?

Airlines chief Abdulatif said Turkey's action was "inhumane" and that the airline would lodge a complaint with international aviation authorities. ? Reuters

Source: http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/277908/news/world/syria-says-plane-from-russia-carried-legal-cargo

dick cheney hcg drops reason rally mad hatter azerbaijan ryan howard ps i love you

Insomnia can make workplace safety in Alabama a nightmare ...

Maybe it was a long night; the baby is teething and just cried until sunrise. Maybe stress kept you up. Or maybe for no reason at all, you just couldn't sleep. Tossing and turning through the night can make the following workday feel agonizing for workers in Alabama or anywhere else. You are nodding off and your eyes are losing focus as you are attempting to do your job. It seems that the only thing you have enough energy to do is watch the clock until you can go home and try to take a nap.

Several studies have concluded that insomnia has a serious impact on the work environment. How much? One journal found that insomnia results in $63.2 billion dollars in lost productivity and other expenses each year. A significant portion of that sum was the result of workplace accidents and workers' compensation benefits paid to injured workers in accidents stemming from sleep deprivation.

According to a psychiatric journal, an estimated 274,000 workplace errors and accidents occurred last year resulting from insomnia. In some instances, a sleep deprived worker in Alabama can make an error like sending an email to the wrong client and losing their business. However, sometimes the accidents are much more detrimental. For example, a construction worker could nod off while operating heavy machinery and critically injure a fellow worker.

The conclusion is that an estimated 7.2 percent of workplace errors are the result of insomnia. It is a serious cause for concern. If a worker in Alabama is injured because of an insomnia-related accident or error, they should be covered by their employer for medical bills and missed wages.

Source: The Huffington Post, "Insomnia costs $31.1 Billion In Workplace Errors And Accidents Each Year: Study," Oct. 8, 2012

Source: http://www.huntsvillepersonalinjurylaw.com/2012/10/insomnia-can-make-workplace-safety-in-alabama-a-nightmare.shtml

andy whitfield kennedy demi moore roy oswalt kevin martin 2012 senior bowl chuck series finale

Romney: Big Bird going to be fine (CNN)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/254383321?client_source=feed&format=rss

king arthur there will be blood there will be blood nigel barker 420 secret service fenway park

Power of addiction and addiction to power ? Beyond Meds

Whether or not you?ve ever dealt with a full-blown addiction, the compulsive desire to distract oneself from the pain of being human is universal. For this reason Gabor Mat??s work and insights can be valuable for anyone.

Addicts, like those who get labeled with mental illness have something in common. They have histories of TRAUMA

Gabor Mat? helps us understand about our humanity and that of addicts too. We?re all very much the same.

Another post that features Gabor Mate. ???Medical profession, puts all emphasis on genetics rather than environment & that takes everyone off the?hook?

This is Gabor Mate?s latest book which comes highly recommended: In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters with Addiction

These look interesting too:

? ?When the Body Says No: Exploring the Stress-Disease Connection

? ?Scattered: How Attention Deficit Disorder Originates And What You Can Do About It

____________________________________________

Share this:

Like this:

Like

Be the first to like this.

Source: http://beyondmeds.com/2012/10/11/power-of-addiction/

doppler radar colorado rockies moonshine news channel 4 radar weather weather channel lionel richie

Misleading Anti-Marriage Ads in Maine. AFER Corrects False ...

Two new anti-gay ads just started running in Maine this week. And as usual, they?re full of misleading, hurtful statements.

We can break down the claims in these commercials by using the testimony from AFER?s Prop. 8 trial. That case was like a marriage equality ?truth commission? that, for the first time, examined our opponents? claims in a federal court of law. And we found that in court, where there?s no room to hide behind misleading statements and vague threats, the arguments of our opponents simply have no basis in fact. They melt away.

Here?s the first ad:

?If Question 1 passes, redefining marriage, we can expect consequences for Mainers.?

Let?s stop right there. Question 1 is the ballot measure that would allow the state to issue marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples. If it doesn?t pass, the consequences for Mainers is clear: no marriage for gays and lesbians. That is immediately harmful to those couples and their kids.

So, what are they claiming are the consequences if it does pass? Well, that?s a lot less clear.

?I was a successful school counselor in Maine for over 20 years. Once nominated as teacher of the year. Yet when I supported traditional marriage, they tried to get me fired.?

This is Don Mendell. And what he?s not telling you is that he didn?t just support an anti-gay law. He went on television and attacked gay and lesbian Mainers, despite being a school counselor at a public high school. Here he is back in 2009:

?Prevent Question 1 from being pushed on Maine students.?

Mendell wrote that LGBT couples ?use children?s trusting nature to turn them against the natural law.?

Words like these do profound harm to young gay and lesbian people, especially when they come from a school counselor. That?s why he was investigated.

?When gay marriage has become law elsewhere, people who disagree with it have been fired, sued, fined, and punished.?

There are a lot of problems with this statement. Don wasn?t fired, sued, fined, or punished. The complaints against him were dismissed.

And marriage equality wasn?t even law during that time. So, whether or not gay and lesbian couples could get married, the complaints against him would have been exactly the same. In other words, marriage equality didn?t cause his problems. He caused them by speaking out against the very kids in his care.

The fact is, nobody gets punished just for having an opinion. There are only consequences for harassing people, or attacking them, or using public resources to discriminate, or using your position of authority to cause harm.

And that?s just what these marriage bans do. During the Prop. 8 trial, Professor Lee Badgett testified that laws like Prop. 8 have ?inflicted substantial economic harm on same sex couples and their children.?

And Professor Gary Segura pointed out ?There is no group in American society who has been targeted by ballot initiatives more than gays and lesbians.?

Now let?s take a look at the second ad.

?Marriage as a man and a woman has served Maine for hundreds of years.?

Well, it?s served some people for hundreds of years. Others, like gay and lesbian Mainers, have been out of luck.

?Marriage is more than what adults want for themselves. It?s also about the next generation.?

That?s true. And it?s why it?s so important that gay and lesbian parents be allowed to get married. Not just for themselves, for the children that they?re raising. One of the Prop. 8 proponents? own witnesses admitted as much on the stand during the trial. David Blankenhorn testified, ?same-sex marriage would likely contribute to more stability and to longer-lasting relationships for same-sex couples.?

He added that the freedom to marry ?would extend a wide range of the natural and practical benefits of marriage to many lesbian and gay couples and their children,? and that it would be ?a victory for the worthy ideas of tolerance and inclusion.?

Blankenhorn?s admissions are persuasive. So persuasive, in fact, that he eventually changed his mind, and he?s now a supporter of marriage equality.

Straight couples do a great job of raising the next generation. But they?re not the only ones doing it.

?Maine law prohibits discrimination against gay men and lesbians??

That?s true. And the reason that we prohibit discrimination is that it hurts all of society, and helps no one. As the Ninth Circuit ruled, ?Prop. 8 serves no purpose, and has no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity of gays and lesbians in California ? The Constitution simply does not allow for ?laws of this sort.??

?And same-sex couples already have the legal protections of marriage in virtually all matters.?

Did you catch that? Virtually all matters. They?re admitting that domestic partnerships are unequal, but trying to make it okay by saying, in essence, ?close enough.?

?Anything remaining can be addressed without redefining marriage.?

No. It can?t. We?ve tried. You need an army of lawyers and thousands of dollars to try to close the gap between a domestic partnership and a marriage. Not to mention, California?s had domestic partnerships since 1999, and every single year they have to pass new laws to try to close loopholes that prevent gay and lesbian couples from being treated equally.

At this point in our country?s history, we can say with confidence that separate is not equal. And it never will be.

By the way, you might be wondering who?s paying for these embarrassing ads. The answer is: we don?t know.

What we do know is that the National Organization for Marriage is funneling a ton of money into Maine without reporting their funding sources. And they recently lost a lawsuit over that secrecy. They?re now compelled to report their donors in Maine. But so far, they haven?t.

We?re now less than a month away from the election. And the polling in Maine is encouraging, but it could still go either way, since surveys generally overstate support for the freedom to marry.

Now is a crucial time to get involved in Maine, as well as in Maryland, Minnesota, and Washington. Visit afer.org/election2012 for ways that you can support the freedom to marry in those states. Together, we can push back against these misleading, dangerous messages.

What You Can Do

Source: http://www.afer.org/blog/misleading-anti-marriage-ads-in-maine-afer-corrects-false-claims-with-fact/

indoor football league newt gingrich wife callista rick perry travis barker get back on board rob lowe peyton manning

ap_michelle_obama_jef_ss_121010_ssv.jpg

{ttle}

{cptn}","template_name":"ss_thmb_play_ttle","i18n":{"end_of_gallery_header":"End of Gallery","end_of_gallery_next":"View Again"},"metadata":{"pagination":"{firstVisible} - {lastVisible} of {numItems}","ult":{"spaceid":"2145892301","sec":""}}},{"id": "hcm-carousel-1391284490", "dataManager": C.dmgr, "mediator": C.mdtr, "group_name":"hcm-carousel-1391284490", "track_item_selected":1,"tracking":{ "spaceid" : "2145892301", "events" : { "click" : { "any" : { "yui-carousel-prev" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"prev","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } }, "yui-carousel-next" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"next","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // no more pages, don't beacon again // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } } } } } } })); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {(function() { try{ if (Math.floor(Math.random()*10) == 1) { var loc = window.location, decoded = decodeURI(loc.pathname), encoded = encodeURI(decoded), uri = loc.protocol + "//" + loc.host + encoded + ((loc.search.length > 0) ? loc.search + '&' : '?') + "_cacheable=1", xmlhttp; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); else xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); xmlhttp.open("GET",uri,true); xmlhttp.send(); } }catch(e){} })(); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings = '"projectId": "10001256862979", "documentName": "", "documentGroup": "", "ywaColo" : "vscale3", "spaceId" : "2145892301" ,"customFields" : { "12" : "classic", "13" : "story" }'; Y.Media.YWA.init(Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {if(document.onclick===YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.newClick){document.onclick=YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.oldClick;} }); }); });

Bad Cripple: Rocking the Cradle: On Parenting and Disability


On September 27 the National Council on Disability released an important document: Rocking the Cradle: Ensuring the Rights of Parents with Disabilities and Their Children. I spent most of last night reading the report. Nothing I read was surprising to me because many of the barriers and blatant bias described in detail I experienced first hand. Here is the link:?http://www.ncd.gov/publications/2012/Sep272012/ The NCD Executive Summary states: The goal of this report is to advance understanding and promote the rights of parents with disabilities and their children. The report provides a comprehensive review of the barriers and facilitators people with diverse disabilities?including intellectual and developmental, psychiatric, sensory, and physical disabilities?experience when exercising their fundamental right to create and maintain families, as well as persistent, systemic, and pervasive discrimination against parents with disabilities. The report analyzes how U.S. disability law and policy apply to parents with disabilities in the child welfare and family law systems, and the disparate treatment of parents with disabilities and their children. Examination of the impediments prospective parents with disabilities encounter when accessing assisted reproductive technologies or adopting provides further examples of the need for comprehensive protection of these rights. The report detailed twenty finding and made many recommendations. Below are direct quotes from the report?s twenty findings. ? FINDING 1: There are few accurate and comprehensive sources of information on the prevalence of parents with disabilities. FINDING 2: The child welfare system is ill-equipped to support parents with disabilities and their families, resulting in disproportionately high rates of involvement with child welfare services and devastatingly high rates of parents with disabilities losing their parental rights. FINDING 3: Parents with disabilities who are engaged in custody or visitation disputes in the family law system regularly encounter discriminatory practices. FINDING 4: Parents with disabilities who are involved in dependency or family proceedings regularly face evidence regarding their parental fitness that is developed using inappropriate and unadapted parenting assessments. Resources are lacking to provide adapted services and adaptive parenting equipment, and to teach adapted parenting techniques. FINDING 5: Prospective adoptive parents with disabilities face significant barriers to adopting children, both domestically and internationally. FINDING 6: People with disabilities face significant barriers to receiving assisted reproductive technologies (ART), despite its importance for many people with disabilities who want to procreate. FINDING 7: Personal assistance services (PAS) are a crucial support for many people with disabilities but usually may not be used to assist them with their parenting activities. FINDING 8: Parents with disabilities face significant barriers to obtaining accessible, affordable, and appropriate housing for their families. FINDING 9: Many parents with disabilities face barriers to traveling with their families using paratransit services. FINDING 10: Parents with disabilities have significantly less income and more frequently receive public benefits. FINDING 11: People with disabilities, especially women, face significant barriers to receiving proper reproductive health care. FINDING 12: Parents and prospective parents with disabilities face a significant lack of peer supports. FINDING 13: Social service providers regularly overlook the parenting role of their consumers. FINDING 14: Formal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part C Early Intervention (EI) programs and other non-Part C early intervention and prevention model programs are an appropriate service option for many children of parents with disabilities. FINDING 15: Parents with disabilities involved in dependency or family law proceedings face significant barriers to retaining effective and affordable legal representation. FINDING 16: Centers for Independent Living (CILs), with appropriate training, can provide services to parents with disabilities. FINDING 17: Despite limited funding and little national attention given to parents with disabilities and their families, a number of programs and support services have begun to emerge across the nation; they must be replicated nationally to provide consistent capacity to support parents with disabilities and their children. FINDING 18: The impact of disability on the integrity of American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) families has been utterly neglected by professionals in the fields of law, policy, and research. FINDING 19: Federal legislation, similar to the Indian Child Welfare Act, must be enacted to address the systemically disparate treatment faced by parents with disabilities throughout the country. FINDING 20: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) reinforces the rights of people with disabilities to create and maintain families. These finding are not exactly ground breaking but when listed together are a devastating reminder of the significant barriers people such as myself encounter when they want to start and maintain a family life. When I read the report last night I thought why did I not read about this in the news. I did a quick online search and found many groups support the NCD findings. All applaud the report and consider it an important document, among them The Council For Exceptional Children, Autistic Self Advocacy Network, Alaska Governor?s Council on Disabilities and Special Education, United Cerebral Palsy and multiple Independent Living Centers too numerous to mention. I am listing just a small fraction of the disability groups that praised the NCD report. Conspicuous by its absence is a single major news outlet. Well, not really. One newspaper in the nation mentioned the report?the Sacramento Bee. The New York Times and Wall Street Journal did not even use the report as filler nor did a single newspaper in any major city in the country. The Huffington Post?not a word. It is as though the report was issued within the vacuum of space. Sadly, this does not surprise me one bit. My son and the ADA came into existence within two years of each other. As he has grew I saw how the ADA failed to gain any traction?that is the ADA was the law of the land but there was no social mandate to follow the law. This led my son to conclude at a young age no one cares. Why would he say this? Read the findings above. He and I experienced many of the above findings. Not all but many. So in the process of coming of age my son learned a lesson no father wants his child to learn?no one cares. As he grew older he would often say ?Dad, the ADA is bull. Lip service is paid to the law. You and I are the only people that care?.? He was largely correct. Of course some people care but this out of the norm. In my experience most people will politely listen to others who state there is a need for wheelchair access or a lift on a school bus or an elevator or a ramp or a curb cut etc. Most will agree such access is the ideal. At some point however there will be an awkward pause or silence. Someone will mention a tight budget, another will bring up the words I have learned to dread??reasonable accommodations?. When this happens I know access is a lost cause. And this, the complete lack of social demand for access, is what my son learned by the time he was in first grade. As I fell asleep last night, I thought not much has changed aside from the law, a law most Americans consider somehow different from other civil rights legislation. ?????

Source: http://badcripple.blogspot.com/2012/10/rocking-cradle-on-parenting-and.html

charlize theron telenav telenav wade phillips wade phillips time person of the year sag nominations